£4,200 in Parts Used But Never Invoiced — Found in Week One

£4,200 Found in Week 1
£840 Recovered Per Week
91% Leak Reduction
£43k+ Projected Annual Recovery

At a Glance

Business Independent garage — servicing, repairs, MOTs & diagnostics
Location Cheshire
Team Owner + 4 technicians + 1 receptionist
Previous System Desktop invoicing software + paper job cards
Annual Parts Spend ~£95,000
Plan Pro — £139/month

The Situation

Steve runs a 4-bay independent garage in Cheshire. The business handles general servicing, repairs, MOTs and diagnostics with an annual turnover of approximately £420,000. Parts spending runs at roughly £95,000 per year — the single largest cost line after wages.

Job cards were handwritten on paper. When a technician needed a part, they either pulled it from the shelf or ordered it from the supplier. The part went on the car. At the end of the job, the receptionist typed up the invoice using the paper job card as the source — manually adding whatever parts the technician had written down.

"I always assumed if a part went on a car, it went on the invoice. I was wrong." Steve had never compared his parts purchase total against his parts invoicing total. When he finally did, the gap was significant.

Anatomy of a Parts Leak

The leak wasn't caused by theft, dishonesty or negligence. It was caused by a broken process — a gap between the shelf and the invoice that no one could see:

🔧

Technician pulls a filter from the shelf

Fits it to the car. Writes "oil + filter service" on the paper job card. Doesn't list the filter separately — it's included in the service price in their head.

📋

Mid-job, a worn belt is spotted

Technician calls the customer, gets verbal approval, fits the belt. Writes "belt" on the job card. Doesn't write the part number, price, or supplier. Moves to the next job.

🧾

Receptionist types the invoice at 4pm

Reads the handwriting. Invoices the service, the belt labour. The belt part cost? Missed — because the price wasn't on the card and no one checked the purchase order. The filter? Absorbed into the service price without a separate line.

📦

End of month — supplier invoice arrives

Steve pays £7,800 for parts. The garage invoiced £7,100 in parts to customers. The £700 difference? Invisible. Absorbed. Repeated every single month.

"It wasn't anyone's fault. The system made it easy to miss parts. Every single step was manual and every manual step was a chance for something to fall off."

The Fix

My Garage CRM connects the shelf to the invoice. When a technician adds a part to a digital job card, that part — with its description, cost price, selling price and supplier — automatically appears on the invoice. It cannot be missed because the invoice is generated from the job card, not typed separately.

Week-by-Week Comparison

Steve tracked the gap between parts purchased and parts invoiced for the first 5 weeks after switching:

Week Parts Purchased Parts Invoiced Gap
Pre-switch average £1,830 £1,010 -£820
Week 1 £1,790 £1,680 -£110
Week 2 £1,860 £1,790 -£70
Week 3 £1,920 £1,860 -£60
Week 4 £1,750 £1,700 -£50
Week 5 £1,810 £1,740 -£70

The weekly gap dropped from £820 to an average of £72 — a 91% reduction. The remaining small gap is accounted for by warranty parts and internal use items (cleaning supplies, consumables) which are legitimately not customer-invoiced.

£43,680
Projected annual revenue recovery
Based on £840/week average recovery × 52 weeks. Previously invisible, now captured automatically.

Before and After

❌ Before

  • Paper job cards — parts handwritten
  • Invoices typed separately from job cards
  • No link between stock and billing
  • Parts gap of £820/week — invisible
  • No part-level cost tracking per job
  • Supplier invoices never reconciled against customer billing

✅ After

  • Digital job cards — parts added with price
  • Invoice auto-generated from job card
  • Parts deduct from stock and appear on invoice simultaneously
  • Parts gap reduced to £72/week (warranty + consumables)
  • Full cost and margin visible per part, per job
  • Parts purchased vs parts invoiced reportable at any time

Results After 90 Days

Revenue recovered

Over 90 days, the garage recovered approximately £4,200 per month in parts that were previously used but unbilled — a total of £12,600 in the first quarter. This is not new work or new customers. It's revenue from work already being done, now being captured.

Margin visibility

For the first time, Steve can see the parts margin on every job. The reporting dashboard shows cost price, selling price and margin per part line. In the first month, he identified three commonly used parts where the markup was below target and adjusted pricing accordingly.

Stock accuracy

Because parts are now deducted from stock when added to a job card, the stock count in the system matches the shelf. Low-stock alerts fire before parts run out — not after a job is delayed because someone used the last filter without telling anyone.

Technician behaviour

Technicians adapted to adding parts on the digital job card within two days. The process is actually faster than writing on paper because the parts catalogue auto-suggests items and pre-fills prices. No resistance, no training issues.

"£43,000 a year. That's what we were losing. Not to theft — to a broken process. The system cost us £139 a month and recovered that in the first two days."

Key Takeaways

How Much Are You Losing to Uninvoiced Parts?

Most garage owners don't know until they connect stock to billing. Start your free 28-day trial and find out.